1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
nientedal
overlypolitebisexual

“why can’t female heroes kick arse in heels” because it’s not practical and will literally snap your damn ankle you can scream weaponised femininity all you want but first off, you need to admit that they’re not an almighty symbol of empowerment, and secondly that if you do a job with a lot of physical activity in heels you’re risking your own safety. all these women fighting in heels on tv are going to end up seriously injuring themselves. 

overlypolitebisexual

weaponised femininity is a concept made up in an attempt to get us to embrace the industries created to hold us back/profit from our insecurities so that we can continue to fit into the male expectation of what a woman should be and not question why we are forced to spend thousands on our appearance every year

brinigi

just a small anecdote. I had a friend who worked in theater; she was the stage manager and an actress came to her in tears one day because the director absolutely refused to let her do a choreographed fight scene in less than 3 inch heels because “they’re platforms so you’ll be okay.” My friend, who is a woman’s size 10, brought her own heels in the next day and DEMANDED the director put them on and try the choreography before the actress did it. He finally agreed to change it, without putting the heels on.

so like I know you might think of “all those women on tv fighting in heels” as fictional woman who WOULD hurt themselves in real life, but its fiction so its okay…except those women are portrayed by real actresses who are actually fighting in actual heels, being directed by dudes who have never worn a pair of heels in their lives, alongside men who aren’t expected to constantly wear things that make their stunts 2x more dangerous than they have to be. Just a thought.

marzipanandminutiae

Men take “let’s see feminine women being badass” to mean “let’s see women impractically focused on their appearance in combat situations.“

ai-yo

That’s why I loved Black Panther even more Nakia took off her heels and used them as weapons and was running and driving around barefoot in that one scene

crystalzelda

A number of stuntwomen have spoken out about getting injured on sets because the character is wearing heels and skimpy clothing that provide no protection or padding. It literally harms rl women.

https://amp.theguardian.com/film/2016/jun/29/why-stuntwomen-are-in-more-danger-than-men

nientedal

I think a lot of men, and some women too, have the misconception that heels aren’t painful and are easy to walk in.

This is not true. They are painful. And they’re only easy to walk in if they fit and you know how to do it (and even then, some are easier than others). And they’re easy to do NOTHING ELSE in. Go upstairs? Not easy. Go downstairs? Not easy.

I decided a while ago that I wanted to wear heels, so I learned how to do it and I learned what I could and could not do in them. As far as pain went, I just…dealt with it. I have a desk job; even then, kicking off my shoes under my desk was integral to making it through the day. But standing in heels is uncomfortable, and walking in heels is uncomfortable, and NONE of it is comfortable, and you learn to make do because that is the trade-off for looking the way you want to look (if that’s how you want to look, and for me, it was).

One time, a younger female coworker told me she didn’t know how I could wear shoes like that without my feet hurting.

(kind of like these ones from jjshouse.)

I told her, no, they do hurt. You just…get used to it. And you don’t push it, don’t try to walk long distances or stand up for long periods of time without taking a break. She asked why I would do that to myself. I shrugged. “It’s how I want to look, and I can do it right now.”

But the thing is, the only reason I could wear shoes like that is because I sit on my ass all day. Even our office wasn’t very big (we were located in a big old stone house). If I’d worked in a big office building? Those shoes might not have been an option anymore, even with me sitting on my butt most of the time. I cannot emphasize the extent to which distance is not a thing in shoes like those. Even in shorter heels, you’re not going to be going far.

Heels hurt. Even the most comfortable pairs hurt; they just hurt less. People who want to wear heels (and can do so) either put up with the pain or decide they don’t actually want to wear heels that badly after all.

So, fighting? Fighting in heels? Not if there’s any other choice available. And I will run barefoot over anything but broken glass before I will run in heels if I have to run quickly. Seeing people in heels in roles where they’re a liability is one of the easiest ways to pull me out of immersion. And it’s dangerous af for the people acting those roles. It needs to stop, is what I’m saying, and I think part of why it hasn’t stopped yet is because Men Don’t Get It.

Your character can look plenty badass in a pair of flat shoes or boots.

Source: fuckoffstraightpeople
uiruu
blackfoxx

The white male style of debate is to antagonize you until you snap. Then they win by default, because they make up their own rules in which being upset automatically invalidates your argument. The key is also to argue about things that they have no stake and experience in, so they dont snap first. Of course in the event that they do snap first, its of course passion, not anger…

White people are like little kids who make up new rules and obnoxious powers to keep themselves from losing….

At the end of it all, they are happy that you are so civil and can debate things rationally and clearly without getting upset. Everyone shakes hands and thanks everyone for being able to discuss “conflicting” viewpoints. Because after all everyone needs to hear the opposing side to truly be sophisticated. Even if you’ve heard that side all your life and it completely devalues you as a human being.

What i hear is that the mark of civilization to white people is being dehumanized and taking it like a champ. 

They also have little to no concept of power dynamics in these ‘sophisticated” discussions.

sentforwho

Why I stopped indulging people who followed this argumentative “format”

controlledeuphoria

This is so real and applicable to every dinner party I’ve ever been to

eviltessmacher

This is a particularly aggressive form of Sealioning.

Sealioning is the name given to a specific, pervasive form of aggressive and willfully intentional cluelessness, that masquerades as a sincere desire to understand.

 A Sealion is someone who, when confronted with a fact that they don’t care to acknowledge, say, the persistence of systemic racism in America, will ask endlessly for “proof” and insist that it is the other person’s job to stop everything they are doing and address the issue to their satisfaction.

The purpose of Sealioning is never to actually learn or become more informed. The purpose is to interrogate. Much like actual interrogators, Sealions bombard their target with question after question, digging and digging until the target either says something stupid or is so pissed off that they react in the extreme. The other major reason why people hate Sealioning is because responding to it is a complete waste of time.

It’s an insidious trap. Responding to questions asked reasonably is, of course, a natural thing for people to do. I like to do it myself; educating others is generally pretty entertaining, especially if they are receptive to learning. Dismissing those questions can appear condescending or rude, especially if you actually are condescending or rude.

Of course, these questions are not asked because the person asking them genuinely wants to know the answer. If they did, they would do their own digging based on your statements, and only ask for obscure or difficult-to-discover information. This is the “debate principle”. It is best explained thusly: When you go to a debate, you educate yourself on the topics at hand, and only request evidence when a claim is either quite outlandish or unflinchingly obscure.

No, these questions are asked to make a responder waste their time. It works, too; I’ve responded to Sealions before, answering all their questions and claims for evidence, only to be greeted by even more willful ignorance. It’s a way to force people into responding to questions phrased neutrally but asked in bad faith.

The name “Sealioning” comes from a most splendid webcomic, “Wondermark”, by David Malki.  

It can be found here: http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/873260-sea-lioning

Sealions are just “asking nicely” but they are asking questions that have been asked and answered fully many times, and are unwilling to so much as open a new tab to look up the answer, nor will they recognize the validity of your sources, your experience or expertise no matter what you do. It is impossible to satisfy a Sealion.

Make no mistake.

Sealioning is a specific form of harassment. You may not explain their inquiry has already been address. You may not cite a source. You may not refer to a previous answer. You definitely may not ever point them to a link. You must spend all your time and energy responding as much as you can to every little details of every innocent, polite little question they ask. Sealioning isn’t a sincere attempt at anything. It’s a calculated technique to grind an opponent down.

digitaldiscipline

If any of my followers feel like you’re being sealioned, I can play elephant seal and help destroy them.

mightyviper

Not only is this a thing, it’s actually something various hard right groups are teaching their members to do. It’s essentially just never backing down no matter what, never admitting someone else is correct, and always try to force the argument onto the path you want to go down. So I’ve found the best way to combat it is:

A) Call them out on their inability to admit they were wrong. This sounds pretty simple, but it’s very easy to get dragged into whatever they say next instead of just pointing out that you’ve proven their first point is bullshit yet they’re still yakking on.

B) They try to box you into a corner? Box them back. If they won’t accept a link, laugh at them for failing to understand it/read it. Call them out for trying to veer the conversation in another direction without yielding the point. Specifically state that you see their cheap tactics and find them weak and a sign of a poor debater.

C) Never let them move onto the next question. Demand they answer yours instead. Why should they get to set the terms of the debate? Why is it always them who deserves explanations?

D) Suggest that they’re arguing in bad faith. That they don’t really want an answer. And if they say no way? Then point out that someone arguing in good faith would do all the things they refuse to. They’d read links and evidence. They’d agree on at least *something*. And failing that, they’d walk away. Good faith arguers will reach a certain point and then just say agree to disagree. But these guys? Won’t. They will not leave it alone no matter what. That’s the hallmark of a sealion trained to demoralise us.

And when they indirectly admit that, you call them out on it.

Then you don’t leave it alone. Hound that fucking sealion until he honks for mercy.

ryanlewisandclark

Still important.

theriversdaughter

So many people in my social circles need to recognize the sealion problem we have, and stop feeding the wildlife.

fabulousworkinprogress

And in case anyone wasn’t clear: This method of argument (push until you snap) is absolutely a form of violence, because it requires you to care less about something in order for your opinion to be valid. It is silencing. It is degrading. It is dehumanizing. It is the very first step to making a person into a thing.

Source: blackfoxx
uiruu
neuropunk-travesty

“My pay gets docked when people shoplift!”

That’s something your boss is doing to you. 

Be mad at them.

stopmakingliberalslookbad

Is your box of Manic Panic and your Rimmel mascara really more important than the well-being of low income retail workers? Oh, but you’re totally stealing to stick it to capitalism!

autonomoustrap

im going to rob you specifically

thinkherenow

Reminder that baby formula is one of the most shoplifted of items.

stopmakingliberalslookbad

None of these lifting blogs steal formula. Don’t be delusional.

autonomoustrap

@stopmakingliberalslookbad

Source: neuropunk-travesty
uiruu
rika-anti:
“ kat-the-dog-trainer:
“ Sorry to break the news, but you did not report the person behind that blog. Instead, you reported me. And I am still suffering the consequences.
I did not run that blog. Yes, they used my image. All my pictures...
kat-the-dog-trainer

Sorry to break the news, but you did not report the person behind that blog. Instead, you reported me. And I am still suffering the consequences.

I did not run that blog. Yes, they used my image. All my pictures from Facebook and Instagram, my statuses, even the captions. And then interspersed them with animal abuse images, fantasies about beastiality, other fucking disgusting sentiments.

You people found my Facebook, where I listed my wildlife rescue group. You didn’t think, for a moment, that it was odd that none of these abuse fantasies appeared on Facebook. A girl who was apparently willing to put her face, her location, the names of her family her local fucking vet clinic on her zoophilic Tumblr page, strangely had none of these thoughts on a just-as-public Facebook page.

Not one single person thought, “This is a bit odd, maybe I should reach out to this person just to confirm that it’s them.”

You people, high on some fantastical idea of justice, called the authorities. And I did not even know about the existence of the blog until the RSPCA showed up on my doorstep one night.

THEY, thankfully, had the sense to believe me. As soon as they showed me the page and I broke down in tears, they got the idea. So they told me to go to the police. The police palmed me off to ACORN (a cybercrime body) who dismissed the case because “nobody in the images was under the age of 18.”

Meanwhile, Tumblr had taken the page down, only for it to resurface again last year.

I then pursued a civil case. Emailed lawyers in my local city. They advised me only to take it to Tumblr, who shut down the page a second time. No further action was taken.

I never received another call from wildlife rescue because I was unable to prove that I did not run this disgusting blog. Wildlife is my biggest passion in the world and I may never work in that industry until I can clear my name.

So I messaged this page - report-a-predator. They told me to prove it - fair enough. So I sent them EVERYTHING. The screenshots, my emails to ACORN and SAPOL and Tumblr and the lawyers. They did not respond. I emailed them again, begging them to clear my name. They did not respond.

I am furious. I am fucking enraged that this post even still exists on their page, because the actions of this so-called “justice group” has directly impacted the life of an innocent person and they will do nothing to acknowledge it. Not even respond to a simple email. Not even take down the incriminating post.

I know my blog is tiny, I know nobody follows it, I know this will probably never be seen. But I am not going to be silent.

If you’re ever caught up in a whirlwind of pseudo-justice, maybe check the facts first.

rika-anti

signal boost!!!

Source: kat-the-dog-trainer
owlbear33
geography-witch

Originally posted by everybodyluvs-jon

crypticanimentor

Please signal boost this, this is a real candidate currently running who excuses pedophilia and white supremacy but disapproves of gay marriage. He has made chatrooms for pedophiles and white supremists, fetishizes his THREE-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER and advocates for the legalization of child pornography. This is sick. Please spread this, there’s not enough notes on this.

a-lovestruck-salamander

This is vile

densoro

killhim kill him kill him kill him kill him kill him

iron-sunrise

Remember when we lived in a world where we could be absolutely sure no one like this would have a shot in the political arena

Whether that was actually true or not (not), still just…oh man.

jaspidoodles

Lest we forget

How much of a danger

This man truly is

And how disgusting it is

jaspidoodles

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nathan-larson-candidate/

THIS TOO, FOR THOSE WHO NEED A LITTLE EXTRA EVIDENCE

castiel-hates-maps

fucking yikes

Source: geography-witch
doppel-anger
welcometonegrotown

It’s an extremely popular opinion among middle and upper class white people.

reverseracism

Also, aside from this completely uneducated reasoning as to why minimum wage was created…

I can guarantee that there are tens of thousands of teenagers who have to pay bills and help support their families or are the only financial supporter to their family.

nerdymouse

Not to mention, if these businesses are only being run by teenagers, then they wouldn’t be able to function or run during school hours. 

fandomsandfeminism

From now on, all McDonalds can only operate between 4:30pm-10pm on weekdays.

Source: welcometonegrotown